Why didn't Barkley or Jacobs sign a long-term deal?īarkley: It's all about guaranteed money. So where do they, as well as the Raiders and Giants, go from here? You've got questions, we've got answers, with New York Giants reporter Jordan Raanan, Las Vegas Raiders reporter Paul Gutierrez and senior NFL national reporter Jeremy Fowler breaking things down. He finished third in comeback player of the year voting.īoth seem primed for a payday, but the running back position has been devalued in recent years. Barkley rushed for a career-high 1,312 yards while scoring 10 rushing TDs and also catching 57 passes for 338 yards. Jacobs led the NFL in rushing yards (1,653) and yards from scrimmage (2,053) while scoring 12 touchdowns on the ground and catching 53 passes last season. And both, it seems, would have benefited from the other signing such a deal to reset the running back market after it tanked this offseason. With neither first-team All-Pro Josh Jacobs of the Las Vegas Raiders nor two-time Pro Bowler Saquon Barkley of the New York Giants agreeing to long-term deals by Monday's deadline for franchise-tagged players, there is a foreboding sense of familiarity to the proceedings.īoth running backs, obviously, would prefer long-term contracts to the one-year, $10.091 million paycheck that comes with signing the tag, though now neither can negotiate a long-term deal with their teams until after the season due to missing Monday's deadline. Saquon Barkley, Josh Jacobs' next moves after tag deadline You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |